Secuur / Services / Compliance
08 · Evidence & audit

Stop rebuilding the same evidence pack every year.

Most compliance effort is not spent being secure. It is spent proving it — screenshotting dashboards, exporting configurations, and reconstructing what was true three months ago from memory. Secuur produces that evidence continuously as a by-product of controls that are already running.

readiness-scan
https://
What it is

Compliance.

Frameworks differ in language but overlap heavily in substance. SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS 4.0 and CMMC all want to know what assets you have, how they are protected, how you verify that continuously, and what you did when something changed. Answer those four questions with real telemetry and most of the evidence pack writes itself.

Secuur maps the controls we operate for you onto the frameworks you are assessed against, then exports the evidence in the form the auditor expects: dated, attributable, and covering the period rather than the afternoon someone took the screenshots.

What you get

Six things this actually does.

01

Framework mapping

Your controls mapped to SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, HIPAA Security Rule, PCI DSS 4.0, CMMC L2 and CNSA 2.0.

02

Continuous evidence

Scan history, asset inventory and remediation timelines exported as dated, period-covering artifacts.

03

Questionnaire answers

Customer security questionnaires answered from the same underlying facts, so two answers never contradict each other.

04

Attestation documents

Signed statements of testing scope, date and remediation status that you can hand to a customer directly.

05

Gap analysis

What is missing, what it will take, and which gaps an assessor will actually pursue — before the assessor arrives.

06

Audit support

We sit in the evidence-review calls and answer the technical questions so your team does not have to interpret them live.

The Secuur difference

The requirement arriving in your next assessment

Post-quantum readiness has moved from research topic to regulatory expectation. NSM-10 and CNSA 2.0 set migration timelines for federal systems and their suppliers; FFIEC, NY DFS and healthcare regulators are asking about cryptographic inventory; and enterprise security questionnaires now routinely include a quantum-readiness question that most vendors cannot answer.

  • A maintained Cryptographic Bill of Materials — the inventory every one of these programmes starts by asking for.
  • Continuous A–F grading with retained history, so "we are quantum-safe" is a record rather than an assertion.
  • A dated attestation you can attach directly to a security questionnaire or customer due-diligence request.
How it runs

Three steps, start to evidence.

01

Map

We take your target frameworks and map them against the controls you already run, marking real gaps.

02

Instrument

Missing controls get implemented so they emit evidence automatically instead of requiring a person to collect it.

03

Export

Evidence packs generated on demand for your auditor, with attestations available whenever a customer asks.

Deliverables

What lands in your hands.

  • Control-to-framework mapping matrix
  • Gap analysis with prioritised remediation plan
  • Continuous, dated evidence exports
  • Cryptographic Bill of Materials (CBOM)
  • Customer-ready attestation documents
  • Pre-filled security questionnaire responses
Questions

Straight answers.

Does Secuur issue the certification?

No — certification comes from an accredited auditor or assessor, and no vendor can issue it for you. Secuur operates the technical controls and produces the evidence that makes their assessment straightforward.

Which frameworks do you cover?

SOC 2, HIPAA Security Rule, PCI DSS 4.0, CMMC Level 2, ISO 27001 Annex A technical controls, and CNSA 2.0 / NSM-10 plus Executive Order 14412 for post-quantum requirements. Coverage is strongest on the technical controls; governance and HR controls remain yours.

What is the current state of CMMC?

Phase 2 third-party assessments are suspended — the DoD class deviation of September 3, 2026 directs contracting officers to remove those requirements from solicitations. Phase 1 is unchanged: applicable contracts still require a Level 1 or Level 2 self-assessment, and a contracting officer still cannot award without a current CMMC status in SPRS. Because nobody external is now checking that score before award, the accuracy of what you affirm carries civil False Claims Act exposure. We produce the dated technical evidence behind the cryptographic controls so the score is defensible — and re-provable when third-party assessment returns. We are not a law firm and this is not legal advice.

Are auditors really asking about post-quantum yet?

In federal and defence supply chains, yes — Executive Order 14412 (June 22, 2026) requires post-quantum key establishment for federal high value assets by December 31, 2030 and signatures by December 31, 2031, and directs contractors to comply with post-quantum FIPS by the end of 2030. In commercial audits, no: neither PCI DSS nor HHS mandates post-quantum cryptography today. There it shows up through customer security questionnaires and cryptographic-inventory requirements rather than as a named control. We would rather draw that line clearly than sell you a deadline that does not apply to you.

We already use a compliance automation platform. Does this overlap?

It complements it. Those platforms are strong at policy, personnel and workflow evidence, and thin on deep technical testing. Secuur supplies the testing evidence — scan history, pen-test attestations, cryptographic inventory — that they expect you to upload from somewhere.

Related services

Often bought together.

Every engagement starts the same way

Know your grade.
Then pick your service.

The scan is free and takes 20 seconds. It also tells us enough to scope compliance properly instead of guessing.